Quote : shouldnt the term rajakar be limited to and used for those who really betrayed the country and killed innocent bangladeshis?

No sir, it shouldn’t be. See as years pass by, Rajakarism is a symbol of traitor in our country. These guys with a fanatic faith of their own gave some reasoning at that time of war- their political view of opposing the liberation, collaborating the Pakis in the genocide and rape of Bangladesh.

That specific ideology remains the same in the cohort. When they match, we call them rajakars like their forefathers. Its not the action, it’s the ideology that matters. They still think what their forefathers did was right. And to make it believe, they ran all those fanaticism in provocative words (in somewhere as posts) which again offends our pride of freedom as it did in 71. Those who made the killing then and those now claiming it was all in the game- are the same bunch of criminals.

Do you think the term al-badr be limited to and used for only to the 313 warriors of prophet Muhammad rather then the pervert killers of the intellectuals in 1971?