People believe slander more than reality because planners and manufacturer of defamation got those placed in front of the public over and over. Even if people doubt a statement, or analysis, comparing that to his or her own understanding, but when that is repeated over and over to them from different sources, people will come to accept it. For such acceptance, the denigration is all simple and repeated often. It does not have to be self consistent or consistent with any other knowledge framework.

Pragmatists are different from slanderers because they’re unprepared of saying the same thing over and over and over. They believe that they’re doing the right thing, and their righteous actions don’t require having a selling or marketing strategy. They may say the same thing a few times. Real deceitful guys would get those things said thousands of times. They push it out, whether people wanted to listen or read it or not.

Realists just do not get the concepts of public relations and mass communications. Truth does not market itself or its products. For one thing, truth does not have a marketing budget. Imagine writing a grant proposal to do something ‘good’ and putting in a line item that was 30 percent of the total request to ‘market’ the results. In contrast, the rejectionists really do understand the fine points of marketing. So, whomsoever we are, pro or anti to a foreign policy issue, or a treaty or treaties, or even about a ‘visit-outcomes,’ we’ve to face it. One thing is clear: there can’t be two truths. So, the truth-party should market it right after something happens before the lie-party market it, and shouldn’t waste time in the plea that people will understand and rate that today or tomorrow. Today’s truth should be made public today with a marketing strategy, otherwise if that is known tomorrow, the merit of the truth eventually fadeout.